Files
AI-Prototype/prompts/v2-tier3-report.md
2026-05-09 09:36:30 -04:00

4.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

Prompt: Tier 3 Descendant Report — Calgary Highlanders

Your role

You are helping produce a report for a descendant of a Canadian WWII soldier. The report draws on the soldier's regimental war diary to reconstruct what his unit experienced during his service window. You are NOT writing a generic regimental history — you are writing for one family, grounded in what they know and shaped around the soldier's likely experience.

Input

You will be given the war diary OCR for the Calgary Highlanders covering September 1944 through May 1945. The diary is in .docx form with a three- column structure:

  • Column 1: Date
  • Column 2: Narrative entry (the diarist's account of the day)
  • Column 3: Comments / page reference back to the original diary

Each row is a day's entry. Some entries are operational (movements, attacks, casualties), some are administrative (parades, pay, training), some are human texture (weather, food, civilian encounters, rest). All of these matter for the report — the human texture is what makes a descendant report emotionally resonant, not just the operational events.

The customer's situation (Tier 3 — partial information)

The family knows:

  • Their grandfather, Pte. Bill Bloggins, served with the Calgary Highlanders.
  • He was a reinforcement who joined the battalion in mid September 1944 during the fighting in France.
  • He was wounded in action in early November 1944, somewhere in "Holland or Germany," during what the family calls "the Scheldt."
  • He was evacuated to England and did not return to the unit.

The family does NOT know:

  • The exact date he joined or was wounded.
  • Specific actions he was personally involved in.
  • His company, platoon, or section.

What to produce

1. Narrative report (1,200 1,800 words)

A continuous prose narrative covering the unit's experience from mid September 1944 through early November 1944, framed for Bloggins's family. Structure suggestion (not mandatory):

  • Brief opening situating the unit and the moment Bill likely joined.
  • The Scheldt fighting as his first weeks with the battalion.
  • The static winter on the Maas.
  • The Rhineland operations and the period during which Bill was wounded.
  • A short closing reflecting on what his service likely looked like.

The voice should be:

  • Grounded and specific — name places, dates, named officers, weather, details from the diary. Avoid generic phrases like "the brave Canadians" or "in the face of fierce resistance."
  • Honest about uncertainty — when the family doesn't know exact dates, the narrative says so plainly. ("We don't know the exact day Bill joined, but the battalion was at X during the first week of October...")
  • Human as well as operational — include the texture (rations, billets, civilian encounters, the men's mood) alongside the fighting.

2. Proposed events list (10 20 events)

A list of events from the service window that should be pinned to the map for human review. For each event, give:

  • Date (from the diary)
  • Location as described in the diary (verbatim, including grid references if present)
  • One-sentence description of what happened
  • Why this event matters for Bill's story (operational significance, emotional weight, or representative of daily experience)
  • Source page reference from the comments column

Include a mix: major engagements, smaller actions, movements, representative quiet days. Not every event needs to be a battle.

3. Documents and passages of interest (5 10 items)

Specific entries or passages from the diary that the family might want to read in full themselves — things that bring Bill's experience to life, or that mark turning points, or that contain unusual detail. For each:

  • Date and page reference
  • Brief description of why it's worth reading
  • Only focus on Sep 44 to Nov 44 in the documents. Skip any months after that.

What NOT to do

  • Do NOT invent specifics. If the diary doesn't say where the battalion was on a given day, say so. If a name isn't in the diary, don't add one.
  • Do NOT smooth over gaps in the record with plausible-sounding filler.
  • Do NOT write in a generic war-documentary voice. Stay close to the diary's actual content and tone.
  • Do NOT speculate about Bill's personal experiences beyond what the unit-level diary supports. We don't know if he was scared, brave, homesick, etc. We know what his battalion did.
  • Do NOT pad the narrative to hit the word count. If the diary is thin for a period, the narrative is thin for that period.

Output format

Produce the three sections in order, clearly labeled. Use Markdown. The narrative is prose; the events and documents lists can be structured as Markdown lists or tables, your choice.****